Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. Bottom Line Up Front: For most users, I recommend going with the Shure SM58 available here. Today, we’ll be comparing one of the most popular microphones in the world with another. The e835 does sound much pleasing, but the SM58 sounds better if tweaked properly. Judging from so many standards, that would be the Shure SM58. For my money, an extended low-end response is invaluable in an all-purpose microphone and I think the presence hurtle is much more easy to work around than trying to get back low-end that isn’t there on the SM58. While it does have a presence bump and a steep roll-off, the microphone often comes off a bit flat sounding. That isn’t to say that the microphone sounds muffled, because it certainly does not, but it just sounds like a clean slate with crisp clarity. I will be using this "new" mic strictly for recording. Its high frequency lift dips around 7.5 KHz to prevent the vocals from making a hissing noise. It’s very difficult to call a winner in a category in which the sound is so dependent on the source. Would an Audix OM-2 be as effective for record drums as an SM57? In terms of durability, it’s hard to beat a SM58. The $99 handheld dynamic market is vast beyond all measure with offers not only from Shure and Sennheiser, but also from Blue, Rode, AKG, Audix, and many, many more. It's odd that the OP had the opposite experience with the volume. The Sennheiser needs more gain to sound at the same volume of the SM-58. sennheiser_e835.wav (3.51 MB, 42409 views). Released in the year 1998, this mic offers so much for vocals. The Sennheiser mirrors the Shure with an all metal body and windscreen, and feels just as durable in the hands. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Really useful. The Shure SM58 is one of the most legendary microphones in audio. The Shure Beta 58A has been hailed as a rugged and durable stage mic that cuts through any mix, while also rejecting a ton of feedback and noise. Sennheiser has not performed the insane stunts that Shure has, but this microphone can live along the SM58 in terms of durability. Does the grill of the e835 have foam inside of it like a 58?? Juan is a self-professed sound-nerd and the webmaster / lead author & tester for AllSoundLab. The one down side I've experienced to it is it requires a bit more gain than most other dynamics hand-helds. While the marketing material suggests that the frequency response goes all the way down to 50Hz, the true story is that the microphone can barely keep up at 75-80Hz. Plus, who can trust the meter's on most live boards? All of the specs and all of the testing compared don’t matter if the microphone doesn’t sound any good. The female vocalist who owns the Sennheiser is a mezzo soprano gospel singer and we've tried a lot of mic's on her voice (e945, e838, audix om6, om3, akg d5, beta58, sm58, m69 and nd767a) and the e935 works best for her tone and style so far. The fact that the SM58 has stood the test of time speaks volumes for its stellar performance and wide versatility. To me it sounds a bit clearer than the SM58 and also has a higher output level. The e835 clearly beat out the shure, IMO. For the flat response, the SM58 can be used on just about anything and still get a fairly good sound out of it. Since the microphone cannot be shaped like the SM58 though, it can often come off a tad too harsh on some sources since the presence boost is so much higher. Rather,… But the Senn does have a very pretty smooth tone to it. Okay AT2020 is probably on of the most used mic's in streaming world, but it just seems like the sennheiser e835/e845 and shure sm58, give a better advantage in cancelling noise, so just better for people who are in a loud environment. All these features plus the rugged durability of the Sennheiser e835 makes it a perfect first live performance microphone for a lot of vocalists. The e835 tells a similar story to the SM58. I also prefer the Senn 835, but it does have a Freq Resp that is closer to the SM57 and may also work as an instrument mic as well. heh. It sounds more like my voice in the P.A., and less like the microphone, if that makes sense. They are both perfect in terms of durability, but SM58 has a slight edge. What are the main differences between the Sennheiser e835 and the Shure SM58? When comparing the Sennheiser e 835 to the popular SM58, it's a better microphone in most situations. The Sennheiser E835 is one of the renowned microphones in the Sennheiser E800 series. Anyway, I just prefer the clarity and cut it has over the SM58. ... Sennheiser E835 Dynamic Cardioid Vocal Microphone . I chose this over sm58 beta because this one was cheaper. @shanabit: what do you mean by "the shure takes eq really well"? They’re cheap, effective, and just don’t break. I chose the e835 over the SM58 and a couple other handheld microphones. Shure sm58, Rode m1, Or Sennheiser e835. The mic is especially designed for working musicians. It works better out of the box, requires less tweaking, and is generally a better value overall. Sennheiser E835 in a nutshell If it weren’t for the color and size, most people wouldn’t be able to tell the E835 from SM58. However, the most interesting change in the e835 is the extended low-end. The Shure SM58 has a slightly more expansive frequency response range from 50Hz-15kHz, whereas the Sennheiser e835 only goes from 4oHz-16kHz 2. i did'nt do a handling-noise test, but i can assure you, that handling-noise is very quiet on both microphones, a little more bass on the shure. The tried and true $99 dynamic sounds great and can literally be run over by a truck and still work. Attributed to the presence boost, the microphone sounds more open and airy, almost like a stock EQ put on a SM58 normally. Overall it’s comparable to the SM58 but has it’s own flavor. I chose two e835's instead of SM58's for my mic collection. After trying out about a dozen mics, I found the e835 to be far and away my favorite. Frequency Response. Photography More features of the Shure SM58. While it’s virtually unknown to the home studio crowd… Among top industry … While technically the SM58 wins in this category, I’m going to call a draw since both microphones hold up so well. Both the pickup pattern and frequency response are tighter and fuller than the SM58. Does the Sennheiser really have anything up on the SM58? An alternative would be the Sennheiser e835, which is a similar microphone in every way, but it may fit certain singers better. If you are looking for a clearer sound quality, then you can opt for the Sennheiser e845. Let’s break down which mic wins out for durability: The SM58 needs little to no proving to show how durable it is. You will find a slight bump near the top end frequencies, but the midrange is more than level. While the there is a bump in the top end of the microphone (high frequency), the rest of the frequency response is fairly flat, with a steep roll-off beginning at about 100 Hz. Uno de los mejores micrófonos que tiene Shure es el SM58, con la ultima tecnología y de los mejores para cantar en vivo. Let’s see which microphone sounds better: The SM58 is not the best sounding microphone out there, by any stretch of the imagination. Each microphone has its strong suits for different sources and if you’re fortunate enough to own both, you can experiment and find what you like. It's 100 better. On the other side, the lows sound fuller and more defined, making the microphone’s all-around sound more pleasing when first set up. Comparing Sennheiser e 835 and Shure SM58? Out of every single one of them, the Shure SM58 still holds an unbeatable legacy of durability and sound quality only rivaled by a few microphones (including the e835). There is a presence boost, a flat frequency in the midrange and a roll-off in the lows. Presence. It can handle a great number of sources quite easily. Shure SM58 vs Sennheiser e835 – Análisis. Microphones: Shure SM58 wireless, Shure SM58 Beta, Sennheiser e835, Shure SM57 ; House speakers: Yamaha S115V; Up to three floor monitors with horn tweeters; Power amp: QSC 1400 ; Mixing board: Mackie 1402-VLZ Pro; Effects: Alesis Quadraverb; Microphone boom stands and speaker stands; Photo and video services. Let’s see which mic meets this challenge: The SM58 is, again, iconic for sounding great on a variety of sources. Still, the e835 is a nice mic option too, but continue reading to find out how I reached my conclusion…. the shure sm58 and the sennheiser e835S (the one with the on/off-switch). I have an e835 and an e845. The Shure SM58 is lighter at 0.66 lbs, whereas the Sennheiser e835 is heavier at 0.73 lbs 4. If you’re interested in a comparison between the Sennheiser e835 and the Shure SM58 , make sure to check out this post I wrote. The Sennheiser e835 sports some specs on paper over the SM58, but the old favorite is still used in venues and recording studios around the world every single day. However, the SM58 can take EQ really well which is a great thing and is why its used and has been used everywhere. Shure trusted this mic so much that they actually ran it over with a tour bus (it still worked, by the way). The mic uses a shock-mounted capsule with a humbucking coil.